Cruelty of Chickens

monkeymoobs said:

you said if youre friend died from natural causes you wouldnt eat him of coarse not he would be human and my friend but chickens arnt my friends and they taste good as for global warming its impossible for us to kill our planet only kill ourselves and technology will save us if this bullsh*t ever happens

That's one long sentence! As said before I was exaggerating. My point was that I wouldn't eat an animal if it died of old age etc.

Btw. Good luck with your global warming theory.  

Doc-B said:

 (…) If animals could talk and say “Yo, this eating us sh!t just ain't cool” and we prob wouldn't eat them cause of there feelings ect.

(…)

I'm not gonna comment on your whole statement, because it's your personal opinion, and i respect that, but the above quote implies that animals don't have feelings because they can't express feelings orally as well as humanbeings. But ofcourse that is wrong( and I think you probably know that). No animal wants to die(unless in pain or just plain suicidal ofc).

Guess what i had for dinner?!? CHICKEN !!!! it tastes so nice yummy…

anyway back to the point: im a man of few words so heres two…

Prove it… prove that chickens dont want to be eaten, besides if we didnt eat them they would probely end up like the Do-do's 'Extinct' cause besides from eggs and meat we have no need of them and they arnt the brightest animal in the world so they wud die out…

Ps3 Freak said:

Guess what i had for dinner?!? CHICKEN !!!! it tastes so nice yummy…

anyway back to the point: im a man of few words so heres two…

Prove it… prove that chickens dont want to be eaten, besides if we didnt eat them they would probely end up like the Do-do's 'Extinct' cause besides from eggs and meat we have no need of them and they arnt the brightest animal in the world so they wud die out…

Hard to prove on a forum, but It's not rocketscience that animals resist the butchers knife.

So animals we don't need will die out? And less bright animals also die out?

Sorry, but I think you're mistaken.

Put it this way if we had no need for chickens then there position on the food chain would be changed, as it stands at the moment they are bottom of 'our' food chain (the key is in the word 'our' meaning humans), we keep them safe from other predators such as foxes… but without our protection and 'our' interfering hand making sure that chickens are sustainable, the would be remeoved from our food chain and put onto the foxes food chain, but foxes dont five a crap about sustainability all they see is food so they eat as much as they can, and eventuly the chickens would die out unless humans bred them in captivity for no purpose other than being in a zoo (like Rhino's)…