Quantum of Solace – Most miserable online gaming experience

This topic is empty.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 51 total)

← 1 2 3 4 →

Author

Posts
June 25, 2009 at 7:34 pm #29011

Ps3 Freak
Member

Yh i liked Kz2 untill i completed it… but it was too short… Online was good but if you had slight bit of lagg you were f**ked!!! Story was excellent i spent more time on story than online most likely…

June 25, 2009 at 8:32 pm #29019

CoryAllen
Member

parnakas said:

CoryAllen said:

i agree. if it would've had any name besides cod i wouldn't have bought it but the zombies part was nice as well as the addition of dogs instead of helicopters. i still think it's better than killzone. i didn't like killzone though so my opinion may be slightly biased lol

you probably didnt like Killzone for the same reason CoD fanboys didnt..

it felt Different than CoD.. and the second a FPS feels different than CoD, people say it sucks.. Pisses me off.

you're right. i compared it to cod4 because that is my favorite online game. i compare everything to it actually. yes the game is good but i just don't like it. it's not my cod lol

June 25, 2009 at 9:41 pm #29026

gamerben
Member

one of my friends has got this and says it better than all the other shooter “cod and all that lot”. yet when he's online he plays cod4 …

June 25, 2009 at 9:54 pm #29029

CoryAllen
Member

lol what a horrible lier! if cod4 is the best he should just say it! i'm happy to say cod4 is the best because it is. who knows how many days i've spent shooting everything that moves lol

June 26, 2009 at 4:23 pm #29088

Nodanod
Member

Lol, this has gone a bit off topic, but still…

I think cod4 is the best game online.

I dont play it much simply cos i'm bored of the guns and maps

lol, thought i'd keep it concise

June 26, 2009 at 6:14 pm #29095

Ps3 Freak
Member

Nodanod – technicaly it hadnt gone off topic untill i posted this comment about how it technically hadnt gone off topic cuz we justing comparing QOS to other FPS… (any1 understand this?)

June 26, 2009 at 7:24 pm #29098

Nodanod
Member

Ps3 Freak- Yeah, i know this topics on online gaming experiance, i just meant it started 2 slightly come off topic as it wasnt comparing qos anymore but still, i think what i said before is a good conclusion 2 me of cod4

June 26, 2009 at 7:45 pm #29102

kingofgames73
Member

I like KZ2 over CoDWaW and CoD4 over KZ2. But only play CoDWaW a lot because im 10th prestige on CoD4 and the highest level on KZ2 (not counting the 3 extra levels they added), what i like about KZ2 is that it is original, the guns feel like heavy badass weapons not just some pancy stick, i mean on KZ2 when you jump up and down the gun actually moves! simple but nice. Also the sound GFX are awesome and you can listen to music off your XMB whilst playing matches online! (obviously i listen to another bites the dust) but the only problem with KZ2 is that it only takes 2 days playing time to unlock all the weapons, badges etc, whilst CoD4 takes 12 days (roughly for an average player) to get to 10th prestige. Also the rocket noobs on KZ2 definetely spoil the online. But they are not as worse as the juggernoobs, noob tubes, MP40 users, tank campers on CoDWaW! Phew my opinion over and out 🙂

June 26, 2009 at 8:52 pm #29105

Knoxie
Member

kingofgames73 said:

I like KZ2 over CoDWaW and CoD4 over KZ2. But only play CoDWaW a lot because im 10th prestige on CoD4 and the highest level on KZ2 (not counting the 3 extra levels they added), what i like about KZ2 is that it is original, the guns feel like heavy badass weapons not just some pancy stick, i mean on KZ2 when you jump up and down the gun actually moves! simple but nice. Also the sound GFX are awesome and you can listen to music off your XMB whilst playing matches online! (obviously i listen to another bites the dust) but the only problem with KZ2 is that it only takes 2 days playing time to unlock all the weapons, badges etc, whilst CoD4 takes 12 days (roughly for an average player) to get to 10th prestige. Also the rocket noobs on KZ2 definetely spoil the online. But they are not as worse as the juggernoobs, noob tubes, MP40 users, tank campers on CoDWaW! Phew my opinion over and out

perfect explanation but i just think WaW is better than kz2 simply bcoz kz2 was 2 easy 2 complete, & doesnt have much replay value, especially when u get 2 top rank online within roughly 24hrs of play on it

June 27, 2009 at 8:06 pm #29152

parnakas
Member

NuFc – they added higher ranks, they go higher now.

What does it matter if you reach top rank quickly? Then you have all the weapons quickly, and can enjoy playing with other good people..

Btw, the matchmaking in CoD sucked… they just threw you into a game, regardless of your level.. they threw you in with people who were way higher levels than you… Think about it. Its true.

June 27, 2009 at 8:49 pm #29153

Miiiitch
Member

Here’s MY OPINION of all the games mentioned, i’ll rate them by campaign and online.
Qos: Campaign- Great doesn’t sway from the movie too much, Online- Average not the best but not the worst
KZ2: Campaign- Average, Online- Shit servers were terrible for me and it wasn’t that great anyway
CoD 4&5: Campaign- Both were Outstanding, Online- The best ever, i’ve never had any problem with servers and they’re both way more fun.

June 28, 2009 at 8:43 pm #29188

Knoxie
Member

parnakas said:

NuFc – they added higher ranks, they go higher now.

What does it matter if you reach top rank quickly? Then you have all the weapons quickly, and can enjoy playing with other good people..

Btw, the matchmaking in CoD sucked… they just threw you into a game, regardless of your level.. they threw you in with people who were way higher levels than you… Think about it. Its true.

yeh i know im just talking about the original ranks that were there before hand.. & i didnt care about going into a game with higher ranks, made it more of a challenge imo

June 29, 2009 at 5:06 pm #29241

parnakas
Member

NuFc_kNoXiE_KiLa said:

yeh i know im just talking about the original ranks that were there before hand.. & i didnt care about going into a game with higher ranks, made it more of a challenge imo

you thought it was more of a challenge, but i know a lot of people, who in their very first match of CoD4 online, got absolutely raped by level 55's prestige 10. It didnt really make a lot of sense.

MW2 should have 2 options. Quickplay, where they just throw you in, any level. And then Level Match, where they match you up with people your level. This way, it keeps the Noobs with the Noobs, and the Pros with the Pros.

June 29, 2009 at 5:32 pm #29244

Nodanod
Member

I see what you mean, and despite what i'm saying they should still put that it.

All rank means is playtime, you quite often see noobs at high ranks, who can play for a long time, just not very well. To intergrate good players with other good players is very difficult, as some people might camp, get a high K/D ratio, but be poor elsewhere. While Gd .v. Gd plyrs would be good, it is very difficult to achieve.

June 29, 2009 at 6:04 pm #29253

Ps3 Freak
Member

parnakas said:

NuFc_kNoXiE_KiLa said:

yeh i know im just talking about the original ranks that were there before hand.. & i didnt care about going into a game with higher ranks, made it more of a challenge imo

you thought it was more of a challenge, but i know a lot of people, who in their very first match of CoD4 online, got absolutely raped by level 55's prestige 10. It didnt really make a lot of sense.

MW2 should have 2 options. Quickplay, where they just throw you in, any level. And then Level Match, where they match you up with people your level. This way, it keeps the Noobs with the Noobs, and the Pros with the Pros.

They had a similar system like this in waw…
Author

Posts