The Future of COD

This topic is empty.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

Author

Posts
May 14, 2010 at 12:25 pm #15608

emdeepee
Member

This sounds like a very late April Fools.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=246546&site=cvg

Suppose its a good way to continue to milk the cash cow though

May 14, 2010 at 1:07 pm #61906

W4RG34R3D_SN1P3R
Member

Oh god..

May 14, 2010 at 4:18 pm #61908

gow2rules
Member

oh my..

May 14, 2010 at 4:20 pm #61909

GHOST305
Member

Hey this sounds like a briliant!!…wait…no no it doesn't. They are gonna keep going until they cant go any farther…this is sad.

May 14, 2010 at 5:14 pm #61911

Knoxie
Member

hahahaha… stupid bastards.

May 14, 2010 at 7:09 pm #61915

I773D33MABL3
Member

I'd take the piss out of this but seeing as Bad Company seems to be doing it's best to emulate everything COD does I'm actually a little worried…

May 14, 2010 at 9:02 pm #61916

monkeymoobs
Member

maybe they bought the domains to prevent anyone making fake sites. I seriously doubt they would make a future warfare game heartbeat sensors were bad enough let alone another shit load of bollocks attachments to go on your crappy laser rifle.I hate futuristic shooters more than i hate Go Compare adverts and that says a lot.

May 14, 2010 at 11:15 pm #61920

xXL3WISx
Member

monkeymoobs said:

maybe they bought the domains to prevent anyone making fake sites. I seriously doubt they would make a future warfare game heartbeat sensors were bad enough let alone another shit load of bollocks attachments to go on your crappy laser rifle.I hate futuristic shooters more than i hate Go Compare adverts and that says a lot.

WOW !!!!

u must really hate futuristic shooters ALOT to say that loool

May 14, 2010 at 11:19 pm #61921

emdeepee
Member

monkeymoobs said:

maybe they bought the domains to prevent anyone making fake sites. I seriously doubt they would make a future warfare game heartbeat sensors were bad enough let alone another shit load of bollocks attachments to go on your crappy laser rifle.I hate futuristic shooters more than i hate Go Compare adverts and that says a lot.

I'd happily do time for offing that annoying tw@t!!!

Back on point, this does seem like a monumentally bad idea. It'll probably turn out to be a good game, but its just not COD!!

May 15, 2010 at 2:38 am #61931

Ratchet525
Member

fail.

Who would wanna buy that if we have Resistance?

May 15, 2010 at 10:33 am #61935

Antony19
Member

I agree with Rachet why buying future or Space warfare when we have Resistance on ps3 and Halo on XBOX

May 16, 2010 at 10:36 pm #61961

One-Wnged_Angel
Member

The cow was milked to death.

At least we have Dead Space, Resistance and other futuristic shooters instead of this piece of shit.

May 16, 2010 at 11:35 pm #61963

I773D33MABL3
Member

We do already have quite a few futuristic shooters (Let's not forget Killzone and the downloadable crap like Cellfactor and Section 8 but over-saturation has never stopped developers before. How many World War 1/2 shooters were there before COD threw out WAW?

And Resistance doesn't exactly have the future market sown up. It's based around a strong story so it's finite and people will expect it to finish up with the next release. (Unless they pull a Halo and bleed the IP dry).

Futuristic games offer much more variety than modern ones. I think COD has exhausted the number of guns used in modern combat so they can't introduce anything new. Likewise, all of the battlefield types have been done. Once you get through town, desert, forest and snow you're fairly stuck.

Modern Warfare 2 was almost a carbon copy of the first one and 3 will probably follow suit. With Medal of Honour going modern there isn't going to be much room for new ideas.

May 20, 2010 at 4:13 pm #62056

LunaMoonfang
Member

Oh,COME ON !

Not happening.
Author

Posts