Worst Game You Couldn’t Wait For

This topic is empty.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 74 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →

Author

Posts
August 6, 2009 at 1:57 pm #34742

Knoxie
Member

there was nothing wrong with CoD5, the setting was a minus but the it had its plus in zombies soooo

oh yeh Far Cry 2 aswell, i was really looking forward 2 that then 1st 10mins on it i put it 2 bottom of games

August 6, 2009 at 1:58 pm #34743

Knoxie
Member

there was nothing wrong with CoD5, the setting was a minus but then it had its plus in zombies sooo

oh yeh Far Cry 2 aswell, i was really looking forward 2 that then 1st 10mins on it i put it 2 bottom of games

August 6, 2009 at 3:23 pm #34748

BigWoopMagazine
Member

I773D33MABL3 said:

Mirror's Edge. I was blown away when I saw the trailers which made the game look perfectly fluid and the graphics looked incredible. I ended up only playing it as far as level five and even that was a chore. The gameplay was painfully dull, the storyline impossible to care about and the graphics are the worst I've come across. Stuff looks grand if you're running past it but stop and look at it and it's muck. Very bland muck. I ran past a truck at one stage and I had to turn around and go back to look at it, it was so bad. It looked like it had driven there from my PS1.

wow really? I'll admit the graphics weren't top notch but I really liked the gameplay style for Mirror's edge. I always like games where the characters acrobatic abilities turn the level's arcitecture into a puzzle, like PoP or Tomb Raider style, and taking it from first person view point really made it a unique experience.

CoD5 sucks compared to 4. Plain and simple the entire problem with it is exactly what you use to defend it. All treyarch did was copy the game engine and map their own stuff over it. Having the big part done for them, they could have done much better. The clipping on the maps (campaign mainly) sucks, their servers blow, the weapons are lame, and adding in tanks and no other vehicles creates and extremely unbalanced experience. The only cool things they did was adding the dogs as a perk, and the zombie maps. considering you toss an extra 10 spot for each map pack, its just really not worth it at all.

August 7, 2009 at 12:25 am #31787

Knoxie
Member

BigWoopMagazine said:

Post edited 3:25 pm – August 6, 09 by BigWoopMagazine

CoD5 sucks compared to 4. Plain and simple the entire problem with it is exactly what you use to defend it. All treyarch did was copy the game engine and map their own stuff over it. Having the big part done for them, they could have done much better. The clipping on the maps (campaign mainly) sucks, their servers blow, the weapons are lame, and adding in tanks and no other vehicles creates and extremely unbalanced experience. The only cool things they did was adding the dogs as a perk, and the zombie maps. considering you toss an extra 10 spot for each map pack, its just really not worth it at all.

erm, i said the setting was a minus meaning it wasnt very good but it was ok, yeah i know the basically copied everything in what COD4 had but it definetly isnt as bad as ur making it sound… btw their servers are normally PERFECT whenever i play (thats alot) but i agree with they shouldnt of added tanks and nothing else… i thought the guns were fine just not as good as the modern ones and the dogs were great. (7 kill streak not a perk)

and as for the map packs, they are well worth it, the 3 maps they bring out are MUCH better than the older ones and the zombie maps are awesome and fun and hardly get boring.

i know CoD5 could have been improved, but it wasnt that bad at all.

August 7, 2009 at 12:43 am #31801

parnakas
Member

I agree with BigWoopMagazine… CoD5 is a failure to the CoD Franchise. The only good thing about the game once so ever was the Zombie mode. It should have been A LOT better.

August 7, 2009 at 1:22 am #35892

iiDiNkStErR
Member

lol what kinda weapons did u expect in the 1940's ???

August 7, 2009 at 1:24 am #35893

Insania
Member

Lol, you got them there

August 7, 2009 at 1:41 am #35902

parnakas
Member

iiDiNkStErR said:

lol what kinda weapons did u expect in the 1940's ???

thats the problem.. the weapons in WW2 were not as fun as the modernized ones.

August 7, 2009 at 1:43 am #35905

Insania
Member

Yeah,

Springfield's just don't compare to SVD's

August 7, 2009 at 1:52 am #35908

Bdamac
Member

iiDiNkStErR said:

LBP & Far cry 2 – i had the choice of fricking far cry or fallout !!! What an idiot !!!

far cry for me too the trailer was awesome

August 7, 2009 at 2:00 am #35909

WW2fighter23
Member

agreed cod waw sucked and same with skate 2, but good thing i got those 2 platinums before i realized they were bad games

August 7, 2009 at 9:04 am #35930

gow2rules
Member

mine would have 2 be lair so much hype for nill

August 7, 2009 at 9:37 am #35932

TomTom12992
Member

WW2fighter23 said:

agreed cod waw sucked and same with skate 2, but good thing i got those 2 platinums before i realized they were bad games

Are you serious Skate 2 was an excellent game. Maybe not as good as Skate but it did have the Co-op mission things and it brought new online modes such as Hall of Meat.Also if you got a Platinum on Skate 2 you had to have played it for a long ass time because the Online Legend trophy take forever to get

August 7, 2009 at 10:12 am #35936

slick1986
Member

final fantasy x-2 and haze.

August 7, 2009 at 10:19 am #35938

TomTom12992
Member

slick1986 said:

final fantasy x-2 and haze.

most everybody said that Haze was one of there biggest let downs. I never got the game but my freind was in love with that game for the longest time
Author

Posts