Gashead-64
Forum Replies Created
-
Blue Toad Murder Files: The Mysteries of Little Riddle! (from ps store)
18 bronze, 12 silver, 7 gold. All trophies r easy.
As for fun, well, it can be fun, but there is a lot of talking and takes a long time to play through.
It would keep u busy tho!!!
I773D33MABL3 said:
Apologies, I was under the impression we were trying to convince each other of our views. Like in a discussion. On a forum.
And if you're tired of repeating yourself then don't. As opposed to just saying it and then repeating yourself anyway…
On-topic
What did people think of the loser's final earlier? I went in to the game supporting Germany but I was enjoying the match so much I wanted Uruguay to get the third goal so we could have extra time.
The quality of the football wasn't great but both teams went balls-out attacking. I don't think there was one period in the game that was reduced to defensive football or a pass-around.
A pity Muller didn't get his sixth goal. He was my player of the tournament and I think he deserved the golden boot.
1st- balls out… lololol
2nd- Im tired of repeating myself,
because u just dont seem to get that a 2nd England goal would have changed the game. Im not saying England would have won, but they could have, as the momentum wud have been with them, just get that into ur head plz.
I773D33MABL3 said:
@Gashead
Fighting back doesn't mean a team has to draw level. Fighting back describes how a team is playing.
If they draw level; fantastic, they succeeded. But a team can fight back without scoring anything.
When Mexico went 3-0 down they were still in the game and actively trying to score.
England did the same for ten minutes and then wandered around waiting for the whistle to blow.
The idea that if they had got 2-2 that they would have held out is nonsense. Keep in mind the game started level at 0-0 and they still let two in.
England are not a bad side, I support half the players when they play for their clubs (Excluding Chelsea scum!). But they were one of the most under-performing teams in the tournament.
They lost to one of the most impressive teams; people had picked Germany to go all the way.
I can't understand how you can argue that it was wrong for a misfiring England to be beaten by the same team that went on to destroy Argentina 4-0!
OOO look, “Fighting back doesn't mean a team has to draw level. Fighting back describes how a team is playing.”
I have already said that I am tired
of repeating myself, so can u stop replying to me plz I773D33MABL3 ty.
ScottSummers1 said:
NuFc_kNoXiE_KiLa said:
Gashead-64 said:
ScottSummers1 said:
NuFc_kNoXiE_KiLa said:
wtf you going on about RKF95, germany got beat fair and square and you go wild yet england (POSSIBLY) lost because of a disallowed goal and noones been like that
sorry Knoxie, but whichever way you put it, that goal would only have made it 4-2.
and Holland are gonna win. They've played better as a team than Spain have and deserve to win. Spain play boring football and got lucky by beating Germany.
WHY DON'T PPL UNDERSTAND THAT GERMANYS 3RD AND 4TH GOALS WERE BECAUSE ENGLAND WERE PUSHING ALL THEIR PLAYERS UP THE FIELD GRRRRRR
anyone with a real understanding of the game knows that the 2nd goal would have changed the whole complexion of the game. not only were england playing shit in the 2nd half but it looked like they all felt they had 'already lost'. maybe if that goal counted they mightve thought they were still in it and had much more confidence in themselves, as well as not pushing as many players forward. yes the score couldve still been 4-2 to germany, but it also could have stayed 2-2 and maybe england could have won it through ET or pens. im not one to moan when it comes to this, england were outplayed of course, but that 2nd goal could have made the difference i reckon.
dont tell me i dont understand the game, twat.
not if u think, it still would have been 4-2.
I have explained why and am tired of repeating myself! Maybe England would still have lost, but it would have changed the game, JUST ADMIT IT!I773D33MABL3 said:
@Gashead
Fighting back doesn't mean a team has to draw level. Fighting back describes how a team is playing.
If they draw level; fantastic, they succeeded. But a team can fight back without scoring anything.
When Mexico went 3-0 down they were still in the game and actively trying to score.
England did the same for ten minutes and then wandered around waiting for the whistle to blow.
The idea that if they had got 2-2 that they would have held out is nonsense. Keep in mind the game started level at 0-0 and they still let two in.
England are not a bad side, I support half the players when they play for their clubs (Excluding Chelsea scum!). But they were one of the most under-performing teams in the tournament.
They lost to one of the most impressive teams; people had picked Germany to go all the way.
I can't understand how you can argue that it was wrong for a misfiring England to be beaten by the same team that went on to destroy Argentina 4-0!
I GIVE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RKF95 said:
Gashead, why dont u stop trying to start something and just grow up.
And even if Englands 2nd goal counted, Germany was outplaying them the whole game, so get over it.
Germany dominated England = Germany won
Germany got dominated by Spain = Germany lost
Im not trying to start something,
im just stating that it would've changed the game as NUFC_KNOXIE_KILA said. Anyway, if u get dominated u can still win u know.
