NuFc_kNoXiE_KiLa said:
1. he took dawson and king so that isnt much of a problem.
2. walcott showed how much of a gamble he would have been to take. he is really inconsistant and his crosses are generally poor. the difference between his and j.coles crosses was evident to all.
3. as much as i agree about the 'bent over heskey', i dont think bent would work well with rooney and they just havent had enough matches together. ironic as it is heskey is probably playing the best as well atm.
4. hmm i do like that formation, but i cant see lampard being the 'holding midfielder'. thats why i put barry in even though i did want j.cole in the team.
I mean that because King's always injured he should have taken Dawson instead of him in the first place.
Bent should have went instead of Heskey because:
– Heskey's the clumsy bastard that took out Rio.
– Bent scored 24, for Sunderland. Anyone who could score 24 in a season for Sunderland should be in the international team and deserves a medal.
