Seibei4211

scotty243 said:

Basically, this game is limbo. I don't feel as if I wasted my money nor do I feel as if I received the quality and quantity for my buck. It's whatever.

Also, for those looking to play this game: Just do it all in co-op since this game is dull by yourself.

Pretty much, yeah. Hoped it would be better, but whatever. If this game was single player only, it would be kind of unbearable. The co-op missions were pretty awesome though. I'd rather have a game full of those.

Yeah, but not so much more than half the other games that get released these days. They'd be bad if this was a AAA game, but they're ok for a licensed game. Doesn't look like it's gonna be much of a good game though. Anyway, whether or not the graphics are good compared to other games, they're definitely better than they were in the early footage. Don't know if the gameplay's much better though, since this “gameplay” trailer didn't have much of that.

Sly 4's the kind of game that I never really wanna stop playing and the only reason I do is to sleep or eat or something.

It probably wouldn't be worth getting the PS4 when it launches anyway. But the sooner it launches, the sooner it can start getting better and get better games. I waited two years to get the PS3, but it's still wildly underwhemling compared to what they've got now.

They'd be stupid not to put cross-game chat on the PS4, simply because Xbox already has it. It'd be nice to have the option to talk to people even in single player games and we also wouldn't have to deal with problems like Far Cry 3 and Hunted's voice chat problems. I imagine voice chat in singleplayer would be like when I was keeping gr8 company as he did the Warhammer co-op, but I was playing Ocarina of Time while he did that.

Oh, and the Share button on the new controller sounds great. Being able to record the previous 15 minutes of on-screen footage? It was awesome when Just Cause 2 and Joe Danger let you do it, except you'll be able to edit the filler out with this.

Ok, then why do you care about what happens with Saints Row 4? The series isn't for you, man. Just let it go. They're not going to make a Saints Row game that you'll like. You have to be in the right mindset for that game and yours is not the mindset they're made for. You have to be able to not give a crap about characters, story, excellent gameplay, stuff like that, and just have fun messing around. I'm not compatible with certain series, so I don't waste time trying to like them.

Yeah, the dungeon ones could be annoying if you missed them the first time. It's nice that they give you a bit of a passive bonus for finding them though. If it was just for the recordings on them, they'd be totally lame. I mean, unless you liked the stories they told. How far are you into the game?

Edit: Oh, nevermind, I didn't realize you had this game for ages. I thought you just recently got it.

@Doc-B: I wasn't trying to be overly negative of Just Cause 2 or anything, because like I said, it's one of my favorite games ever. I was trying to think about it from an objective view. Far Cry 3's got some of the same problems JC2 has. Each game has good stuff the other game doesn't. Both games can be just as fun if you've got the right mindset for it. Far Cry 3, for me, was probably a little more fun than JC2, because I like silenced sniping and stealth and creating plans of attacks and stuff. Far Cry 3 is probably the objectively “better” game in technical terms, but either game can be subjectively better in terms of enjoyment. I just took umbrage with saying that JC2 is easily the more fun game to play when I had more fun with FC3.

@empeedee: 3 hours in a 40 hour game (if you get collectibles)? Give it a little more time than that. At least spend some time with the second island. Driving's not very advantagous in that game anyway. Boats are good when the situation calls for it, but I rarely ever drove. You almost definitely won't need cars on the second island.

Why are you even thinking about the story this much? You say you don't want to hate this game, but you've just created even more ways for the game to disappoint you. If the story matches your predictions, you'll just be “I thought so” and your opinion of the game will remain unchaged. If it doesn't match, the only way your opinion of the game will get better is if the ending's actually better than you thought. And you're already prepared to be mad at EA (who have little/nothing to do with the story) if they have a cliche ending that you've fabricated?

By the way, this is unrelated, but I've been wanting to know how this works for a while. You dislike Call of Duty and other series that churn out the same crap year after year, but when Dead Space 3 tries to change, you're pissed because it's different? If you had never liked Dead Space in the past, and you didn't like the sound of this one, then fair enough. I just think if you're a fan of the first two, then at least play the third one (for real, not a demo) before you absolutely decide that it's awful. Again, fair enough. It did take me, for example, 12 chapters of Spec Ops before I started liking it at all. I could've just stopped 6 chapters in and said it's the worst thing ever and everyone's stupid for thinking otherwise. I mean, wasn't it annoying that I was bashing that game before I even knew the whole story? I don't know if I'm going to like Dead Space 3 more or less than the previous two, so I'm going to wait until I've played a good portion of it before I make that judgment and keep the speculation out so it doesn't cloud my opinions before I've even played it. Because I wanna be fair, especially with a series I've liked so much in the past.